| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aquariancore Contributing User

Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 165
|
Posted: 01.15.07, 1:10 am Post subject: CSS vs Tables |
|
|
| Do you prefer one or use both? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr_A Admin


Joined: 01 Jan 1970 Posts: 128 Location: Cairns, Queensland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icetray Regular

Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 50 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: 01.25.07, 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, as far as possible, I use tables. For me it just seems easier. It does depend on the type of page you want to build though. For manually edited sites such as those coded in pure HTML, I prefer tables but for those bundled together with PHP, I prefer CSS.
I hope this helps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aquariancore Contributing User

Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 165
|
Posted: 01.27.07, 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am using the sitepoint tutorial to learn CSS, I am very happy with it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deelip Junior

Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 34 Location: perth
|
Posted: 01.27.07, 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I know very little about designing. So I only can do simple things like text or font stuffs on css. Otherwise I use tables rather than css. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aquariancore Contributing User

Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 165
|
Posted: 01.28.07, 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| deelip wrote: | | I know very little about designing. So I only can do simple things like text or font stuffs on css. Otherwise I use tables rather than css. |
See my above post about the css tutorial. As much as I hate to admit it tables are fading away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maxseo Junior

Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 35
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aquariancore Contributing User

Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 165
|
Posted: 01.31.07, 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Both. CSS is wiping tables out. I am one of the few dinosaurs who was doing it all with table. On the flipside the new IE7 is not up to all the standards on CSS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rohitpatel Regular

Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 70 Location: Melbourne
|
Posted: 02.09.07, 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think CSS ie more better for me. I learn CSS most of from sitpoint and w3schools.com. CSS is the more elegant approach, promotes faster page loading, easier maintenance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aquariancore Contributing User

Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 165
|
Posted: 02.10.07, 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rohitpatel wrote: | | I think CSS ie more better for me. I learn CSS most of from sitpoint and w3schools.com. CSS is the more elegant approach, promotes faster page loading, easier maintenance. |
I like the sitepoint videos but they stop short before positiioning.
Last edited by aquariancore on 02.11.07, 3:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tcm9669 Junior

Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 30
|
Posted: 02.11.07, 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CSS imo! they are better, although sometimes tables are better, but CSS is better most of the time! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aquariancore Contributing User

Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 165
|
Posted: 02.11.07, 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| My newest site is css and flash. I used one table for the header. A first for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|